Click here to view entire rankings
After months of extensive research involving the survey of 1100 institutes, 6500 recruiters and thousands of students, Youth Inc reveals the top 100 universities in the world for undergraduate study
An exercise in ranking the best higher education institutes of the world is no mean task. Information gathering in itself is an exhaustive exercise, while number-crunching and analysing gives meaning to the massive raw data. The aim of the Youth Incorporated, Education Times and Rediff.com Global University Rankings 2013 through this sophisticated exercise is to identify and ascertain the universities in the world that are fulfilling their commitment to provide quality education. The study was conducted over several months using research and survey inputs from thousands of people in more than 50 countries. We have brought together a large group of responses from not just institutes but also from current students. Additionally, feedback from 6,500 known recruiters on their experience of recruiting graduates from the institutes has greatly enhanced the survey. Thus, the universities were ranked using the responses of three indigenous groups based on factors that include financial aid, campus facilities, diversity of students, career prospects and more. The survey also allowed us to go one step further and provide you with more specialised rankings which take into account individual factors such as campus facilities, value for money and exchange programmes that come into play when picking a university. We have also ranked the best universities based on regional distribution and have provided separate rankings of the best institutes in study streams such as engineering, the arts, management and the sciences.
What’s Changed From 2011-2012?
Our last survey conducted in 2011- 2012 allows for a comparison which can be seen in the rankings. While it would be expected that the top 10 rankers of any list would remain consistent over time, our results show a shift in the top 10 of the global rankings within the space of a year.
Not only have the top 10 shifted spots, one among the top 3 has given way to another institute. While Harvard University and Stanford University have retained their positions of number 1 and 2 respectively, the previously thirdranked Massachusetts Institute of Technology has slipped down to four to make way for University of Pennsylvania. The rest of the top 10
seems to be similar, barring Imperial College London which makes way for the addition of Princeton University.
On a quick glance, it is apparent that the United States dominates in the realm of higher education. The only non-American university in the top 10 is Oxford which has also seen a drop in rank from our previous survey.
The Indian Angle
The Indian contingent on the list seems to be on the rise – four Indian institutes have made it to the top 100, as opposed to only one in our 2011-2012 ranking effort. The Indian Institute of Technology (IIT) at Mumbai has moved up to 19 from its previous position at 31. Accompanying it are IIT Delhi, IIT Kanpur and the University of Delhi which rank at 27, 79 and 99 respectively. We believe that the educational reforms being implemented in the country are responsible for the increasing visibility of Indian higher education institutes in our global ranking exercise.
That said, our rankings also reflect that institutes other than the IITs are not competent enough to feature with the world’s best institutes, a revelation that should be an impetus to take a long, hard look at the state of higher education in India.
Last month, Prime Minister Manmohan Singh acknowledged the dismal state of higher education in the country. “We must recognise that too many of our higher educational institutions are simply not up to the mark,” he said. Four Indian institutes have made it to the Top 100 list, which is an improvement from last year’s ranking. However, three of those institutes are IITs, making us question the absence of other universities“Too many of them have simply not kept abreast with the rapid changes that have taken place in the world around us in recent years, still producing graduates in subjects that the job market no longer requires.”
In addition, President Pranab Mukherjee encouraged private players to enter the education sector and contribute towards its improvement. However, a study conducted by IDFC indicates that despite such efforts, the higher education sector in India remains “over regulated and under governed”. Pending education bills, restrictive regulations and cumbersome laws are some roadblocks that discourage private sector involvement. The study also suggests that autonomy practised with accountability could be a possible solution to this mess.
Youth Inc analyses universities across the world with inputs from students, faculty and recruiters to bring you a detailed list of the top 100 institutes for undergraduate courses
Last month, Prime Minister Manmohan Singh acknowledged the dismal state of higher education in the country. “We must recognise that too many of our higher educational institutions are simply not up to the mark,” he said
Four Indian institutes have made it to the Top 100 list, which is an improvement from last year’s ranking.
However, three of those institutes are IITs, making us question the absence of other universities
Top 100 Universities
RANK | NAME OF INSTITUTION | COUNTRY | SCORE | 2011-12 RANK |
1 | Harvard University | USA | 100 | 1 |
2 | Stanford University | USA | 99.8 | 2 |
3 | University of Pennsylvania | USA | 99.7 | 7 |
4 | Massachusetts Institute of Technology | USA | 99.5 | 3 |
5 | University of Oxford | UK | 99.4 | 4 |
6 | University of Chicago | USA | 99.3 | 5 |
7 | Yale University | USA | 99.2 | 6 |
8 | Columbia University | USA | 99.1 | 8 |
9 | Princeton University | USA | 99 | 11 |
10 | Cornell University | USA | 98.9 | 10 |
11 | University of Cambridge | UK | 98.7 | 18 |
12 | California Institute of Technology | USA | 98.4 | 12 |
13 | Imperial College London | UK | 98.2 | 9 |
14 | Brown University | USA | 98.1 | 24 |
15 | University of Waterloo | Canada | 97.6 | NEW |
16 | London School of Economics | UK | 97.4 | 20 |
17 | University of Tokyo | Japan | 97.2 | 17 |
18 | Northwestern University | USA | 97 | 14 |
19 | Indian Institute of Technology Mumbai | India | 96.7 | 31 |
20 | University of Michigan, Ann Arbor | USA | 96.5 | 15 |
21 | University of California, Los Angeles | USA | 96.3 | 23 |
22 | Carnegie Mellon University | USA | 96 | 22 |
23 | New York University | USA | 95.9 | 25 |
24 | University of Melbourne | Australia | 95.7 | 19 |
25 | École Normale Supérieure | France | 95.5 | 21 |
26 | National University of Singapore | Singapore | 95.3 | 29 |
27 | Indian Institute of Technology Delhi | India | 95.2 | NEW |
28 | Duke University | USA | 95 | 28 |
29 | IE University | Spain | 94.9 | 37 |
30 | Chinese University of Hong Kong | China | 94.7 | 27 |
31 | University of California, Berkeley | USA | 94.6 | 30 |
32 | Ludwig-Maximilians-Universität München | Germany | 94.3 | 32 |
33 | Hong Kong University of Science & Tech | China | 94.2 | 35 |
34 | Johns Hopkins University | USA | 94.1 | 34 |
35 | Emory University | USA | 94 | 33 |
36 | École Polytechnique Fédérale de Lausanne | Switzerland | 93.9 | 36 |
37 | University College London | UK | 93.7 | 26 |
38 | Dartmouth College | USA | 93.6 | 41 |
39 | University of Virginia | USA | 93.4 | 43 |
40 | University of Copenhagen | Denmark | 93.1 | 38 |
41 | Universidade de São Paulo | Brazil | 92.6 | 47 |
42 | University of Zürich | Switzerland | 92.5 | 39 |
43 | Kings College, London | UK | 92.3 | 40 |
44 | Rice University | USA | 92 | 44 |
45 | University of Texas at Austin | USA | 91.5 | 45 |
46 | University of British Columbia | Canada | 91.1 | 42 |
47 | Peking University | China | 91 | 52 |
48 | Pontificia Universidad Católica de Chile | Chile | 90.9 | 48 |
49 | Universität Heidelberg | Germany | 90.7 | 50 |
50 | Technische Universität München | Germany | 90.5 | 53 |
51 | University of Helsinki | Finland | 90.2 | 51 |
52 | University of Sydney | Australia | 90.1 | 46 |
53 | HEC | France | 89 | 55 |
54 | Vanderbilt University | USA | 88.7 | 49 |
55 | Universidad de Buenos Aires | Argentina | 88.3 | 56 |
56 | Nanyang Technological University | Singapore | 88.1 | 61 |
57 | Fudan University | China | 87.9 | 69 |
58 | Australian National University | Australia | 87.6 | 58 |
59 | Tokyo Institute of Technology | Japan | 87.3 | 66 |
60 | Seoul National University | South Korea | 87.1 | 60 |
61 | University of Southern California | USA | 87 | 57 |
62 | University of Warwick | UK | 86.6 | 75 |
63 | University of Wisconsin Madison | USA | 86.2 | 62 |
64 | École Polytechnique | France | 86 | 71 |
65 | Monash University | Australia | 85 | 67 |
66 | University of Birmingham | UK | 84 | NEW |
67 | Erasmus University Rotterdam | Netherlands | 83 | 70 |
68 | Universidad Nacional Autónoma de México | Mexico | 82 | 68 |
69 | University of New South Wales | Australia | 81.5 | 59 |
70 | University of Edinburgh | UK | 81 | 64 |
71 | University of North Carolina Chapel Hill | USA | 80 | 65 |
72 | University of Auckland | New Zealand | 79.7 | 76 |
73 | Tohoku University | Japan | 79.5 | 73 |
74 | Tsinghua University | China | 79 | 72 |
75 | Uppsala University | Sweden | 78.6 | 74 |
76 | Georgia Institute of Technology | USA | 78.3 | 82 |
77 | University of Queensland | Australia | 78 | 77 |
78 | National Taiwan University | Taiwan | 77.8 | 78 |
79 | Indian Institute of Technology Kanpur | India | 77.5 | NEW |
80 | University of Rochester | USA | 77 | 84 |
81 | University of Groningen | Netherlands | 76.9 | 80 |
82 | University of Bern | Switzerland | 76.3 | 81 |
83 | University of Adelaide | Australia | 76 | 83 |
84 | University of Surrey | UK | 75 | NEW |
85 | Paris Dauphine University | France | 74.5 | 85 |
86 | Ecole Centrale de Paris | France | 74 | 88 |
87 | Stockholm University | Sweden | 73 | 91 |
88 | Tel Aviv University | Israel | 72 | 100 |
89 | University of Washington | USA | 71 | 89 |
90 | University of Amsterdam | Netherlands | 70 | 86 |
91 | University of York | UK | 69 | 94 |
92 | Washington University St.Louis | USA | 68.7 | 87 |
93 | University of Pittsburg Bradford | USA | 68.5 | NEW |
94 | Pompeu Fabra University | Spain | 68 | 98 |
95 | University of Sciences Philadelphia | USA | 67.5 | NEW |
96 | Purdue University | USA | 67 | 92 |
97 | Heriot-Watt University | UK | 66 | NEW |
98 | Bradley University | USA | 65 | NEW |
99 | University of Delhi | India | 64.5 | NEW |
100 | Grenoble Ecole de Management | France | 64 | NEW |
Top US Universities
RANK | NAME OF INSTITUTION | COUNTRY |
1 | Harvard University | USA |
2 | Stanford University | USA |
3 | University of Pennsylvania | USA |
4 | Massachusetts Institute of Technology | USA |
5 | University of Chicago | USA |
6 | Yale University | USA |
7 | Columbia University | USA |
8 | Princeton University | USA |
9 | Cornell University | USA |
10 | California Institute of Technology | USA |
Top European Universities
RANK | NAME OF INSTITUTION | COUNTRY | |
1 | University of Oxford | UK | |
2 | University of Cambridge | UK | |
3 | Imperial College London | UK | |
4 | London School of Economics | UK | |
5 | École Normale Supérieure | France | |
6 | IE University | Spain | |
7 | Ludwig-Maximilians-Universität München | Germany | |
8 |
|
Switzerland | |
9 | University College London | UK | |
10 | University of Copenhagen | Denmark |
Top Asian Universities
RANK | NAME OF INSTITUTION | COUNTRY | |
1 | University of Tokyo | Japan | |
2 | Indian Institute of Technology Mumbai | India | |
3 | National University of Singapore | Singapore | |
4 | Indian Institute of Technology Delhi | India | |
5 | Chinese University of Hong Kong | China | |
6 | Hong Kong University of Science & Tech | China | |
7 | Peking University | China | |
8 |
|
Singapore | |
9 | Fudan University | China | |
10 | Tokyo Institute of Technology | Japan |
Top Australian Universities
RANK | NAME OF INSTITUTION | COUNTRY |
1 | University of Melbourne | Australia |
2 | University of Sydney | Australia |
3 | Australian National University | Australia |
4 | Monash University | Australia |
5 | University of New South Wales | Australia |
6 | University of Queensland | Australia |
7 | University of Adelaide | Australia |
TOP UNIVERSITIES IN/FOR
Business Programmes
RANK | NAME OF INSTITUTION | COUNTRY |
1 | Harvard University | USA |
2 | Stanford University | USA |
3 | National University of Singapore | Singapore |
4 | University of Cambridge | UK |
5 | University of Oxford | UK |
6 | Columbia University | USA |
7 | London School of Economics | UK |
8 | IE University | Spain |
9 | Massachusetts Institute of Technology | USA |
10 | University of Michigan, Ann Arbor | USA |
Engineering Programmes
RANK | NAME OF INSTITUTION | COUNTRY |
1 | California Institute of Technology | USA |
2 | Massachusetts Institute of Technology | USA |
3 | Stanford University | USA |
4 | Imperial College London | UK |
5 | National University of Singapore | Singapore |
6 | University of Oxford | UK |
7 | Indian Institute of Technology Mumbai | India |
8 | Columbia University | USA |
9 | Cornell University | USA |
10 | Indian Institute of Technology Delhi | India |
Arts & Humanities
RANK | NAME OF INSTITUTION | COUNTRY |
1 | Harvard University | USA |
2 | University of Cambridge | UK |
3 | Stanford University | USA |
4 | Princeton University | USA |
5 | Yale University | USA |
6 | University of Oxford | UK |
7 | National University of Singapore | Singapore |
8 | University of Tokyo | Japan |
9 | Columbia University | USA |
10 | University of Waterloo | Canada |
Life Sciences & Medicine
RANK | NAME OF INSTITUTION | COUNTRY |
1 | Harvard University | USA |
2 | University of Cambridge | UK |
3 | Johns Hopkins University | USA |
4 | Stanford University | USA |
5 | Yale University | USA |
6 | University of Oxford | UK |
7 | University of Californias, Berkeley | USA |
8 | Imperial College London | UK |
9 | Cornell University | USA |
10 | University of Waterloo | Canada |
Pure Sciences
RANK | NAME OF INSTITUTION | COUNTRY |
1 | Massachusetts Institute of Technology | USA |
2 | Harvard University | USA |
3 | University of Cambridge | UK |
4 | Stanford University | USA |
5 | Princeton University | USA |
6 | University of Oxford | UK |
7 | National University Singapore | Singapore |
8 | Yale University | USA |
9 | Cornell University | USA |
10 | University of Tokyo | Japan |
Best Value for Money
RANK | NAME OF INSTITUTION | COUNTRY |
1 | National University of Singapore | Singapore |
2 | Indian Institute of Technology Mumbai | India |
3 | Indian Institute of Technology Delhi | India |
4 | University of Waterloo | Canada |
5 | Yale University | USA |
6 | Universität Heidelberg | Germany |
7 | Cornell University | USA |
8 | Hong Kong University of Science & Tech | China |
9 | Columbia University | USA |
10 | Brown University | USA |
Student Satisfaction
RANK | NAME OF INSTITUTION | COUNTRY |
1 | Harvard University | USA |
2 | Stanford University | USA |
3 | Columbia University | USA |
4 | Brown University | USA |
5 | University of Pennsylvania | USA |
6 | University of Oxford | UK |
7 | École Normale Supérieure | France |
8 | University of Cambridge | UK |
9 | Princeton University | USA |
10 | London School of Economics | UK |
Recruiter Satisfaction
RANK | NAME OF INSTITUTION | COUNTRY |
1 | Stanford University | USA |
2 | Harvard University | USA |
3 | University of Pennsylvania | USA |
4 | Carnegie Mellon University | USA |
5 | Brown University | USA |
6 | Indian Institute of Technology Mumbai | India |
7 | Hong Kong University of Science & Tech | China |
8 | University of Waterloo | Canada |
9 | University of Oxford | UK |
10 | Indian Institute of Technology Delhi | India |
Campus Facilities
RANK | NAME OF INSTITUTION | COUNTRY |
1 | Massachusetts Institute of Technology | USA |
2 | Columbia University | USA |
3 | Cornell University | USA |
4 | Princeton University | USA |
5 | University of Oxford | UK |
6 | University of Cambridge | UK |
7 | California Institute of Technology | USA |
8 | Duke University | USA |
9 | Dartmouth College | USA |
10 | IE University | Spain |
Innovation in Teaching Methodologies
RANK | NAME OF INSTITUTION | COUNTRY |
1 | Stanford University | USA |
2 | Harvard University | USA |
3 | London School of Economics | UK |
4 | Brown University | USA |
5 | Northwestern University | USA |
6 | Dartmouth College | USA |
7 | IE University | Spain |
8 | Columbia University | USA |
9 | École Normale Supérieure | France |
10 | Ludwig-Maximilians-Universität München | Germany |
Career Services
RANK | NAME OF INSTITUTION | COUNTRY |
1 | Harvard University | USA |
2 | Stanford University | USA |
3 | University of Pennsylvania | USA |
4 | Columbia University | USA |
5 | Indian Institute of Technology Mumbai | India |
6 | Indian Institute of Technology Delhi | India |
7 | Carnegie Mellon University | USA |
8 | National University of Singapore | Singapore |
9 | University of California, Berkeley | USA |
10 | Dartmouth College | USA |
RESEARCH METHODOLOGY
Youth Inc’s research unit calibrated extensive data from a variety of source, which was then analysed to ascertain the top performing institutes of 2013.
We chose institutes across the world after having discussions with thousands of students, recruiters and faculty. Youth Inc’s Research Unit (YRU) also studied domestic rankings in various countries to find the best institutes. We sent survey links to 1,100 institutes and provided them with unique codes so that they could submit their responses online. Current students of the institutes were asked to specify the stream they were studying and then rate specific statements which were pertaining to the factors considered in this ranking. Several institutes directly contacted their current students and recruiters and asked them to take part in our survey.
Over 6,500 recruiters were sent emails with the survey link. The recruiter list was prepared from the responses of the institutes and also included internationally well-known recruiters. Below are the factors we considered and the overall weightage assigned to them:
♦Careers, recruitment and industry viability of students – 55%
♦Diversity and international outlook – 10%
♦Innovation – 10%
♦Campus, extracurricular activities, exchange programmes – 15%
♦Money, student satisfaction – 10%
Career, Recruitment and Industry Viability of Student – 55%
This category significantly impacts the overall score of an institute since it is the most weighted factor. One of the most important criteria to select institutes is the student’s industry viability after graduation. Recruiters were asked to list and rate the institutes that they were most likely to recruit from. They were asked the likelihood of recruiting again from the same institute and their satisfaction with the institute’s careers cell. Recruiters rated students on various factors including analytical and problem solving skills, leadership potential, communication and interpersonal skills and so on.
Institutes and students were also asked about the availability and functioning of a career services cell on campus and how active such a service was. We also considered what percentage of students were actually placed, both domestically and internationally, through the institute’s career services cell. Students also
reported the availability and ease of obtaining internships.
Diversity and International Outlook – 10%
This category looks not only at diversity of faculty but also at diversity of students in the classroom. The international outlook includes international students that are attracted and retained by the institute. Institutes were asked to report the total number of students on campus and what percentage of the students were international and speak two or more languages. Gender diversity of the students was considered. Institutes also reported the percentage of the faculty that were international, hold a doctorate degree and accredited with their own publishing material along with the gender diversity of the faculty.
Students were asked to rate the student and faculty diversity in their class.
Innovation – 10%
This category looks at how innovatively programmes are constructed and taught and how faculty engage the students – an important factor in the overall
perception of an institute. We considered the different ways in which an institute constructs programmes. Institutes were asked to select from a list of different teaching methodologies that we considered innovative – some of these included
company visits, dual or multiple majors and course collaborations between different departments at the institute. Our list was made after surveying students across different campuses worldwide.
Students were asked to report how satisfied they are with faculty who use innovative ways to teach subjects.
Campus, Extracurricular Activities, Exchange Programmes – 15%
This category considers the support students receive on campus and the availability of extracurricular activities. The exchange programmes offered by the institute and how actively students are encouraged to opt for such programmes was also considered. We asked institutes to indicate the different types of assistance provided by the student office or a similar body on campus. Our initial list was made after surveying students across different campuses worldwide. Students reported if they were encouraged by the institute to participate in different extracurricular activities on campus.
Institutes were asked to report the percentage of students that opted for exchange programmes. We also considered the exchange students present on the institute’s campus.
Money, Student Satisfaction – 10%
This category takes into account a critical part of education today – finances. And more importantly, how satisfied a student is with the institute. We considered students’ opinions on whether a particular institute was perceived as ‘value for money’. We also asked institutes to state the percentage of students who received some sort of funding from the institutes.
Students were asked to rate their institutes on various factors including attitude of staff and professors, location, course content and so on and institutes were asked to report the graduation rate of students enrolled and what percentage of students transfer out of the institution.
Scores
We calculated the standard deviation and standard scores (Z-scores) so that we could combine and analyse the data with more accuracy and reliability. Below is a summary of the factors and the weightage given to each factor when we ranked the institutes. Each factor was made up of a set of questions. The total percentage attributed to that factor was based on the average score of the responses multiplied by the assigned weightage. The total scores were then sorted from highest to lowest. The institute with the highest score was ranked first.
Not Just Numbers
After we calculated the total computed scores for the institutes, we subjectively analysed the data provided by the institutes, current students and recruiters. If we found discrepancies in the satisfaction scores and the subjective descriptions, we omitted the data.
Missing Data
In a few rare occasions, some institutes did not supply data for all the questions in the survey. When data was missing, which affected factors which were low-weighted such as value for money or campus support, we entered an estimate between the average and the lowest value reported by the institute. By following such a practice we did not excessively penalise an institution with a ‘zero’ for data that it could not provide. At the same time, the institute was not rewarded.
Exclusion of Institutes
Only institutes that offered undergraduate programmes were included in the ranking. Hence, some institutes were disqualified from our ranking because they reported data pertaining to graduate programmes.
Institutes that did not fill out the Survey Reports on Time
Of the 1,100 institutes that were contacted, 23 per cent of the institutes did not complete the survey on time or did not respond. We used publicly available information on some of these institutes to include them in our ranking. We also contacted current students and recruiters of these institutes and compared the data we received with the data from institutes that participated in our survey.
YE! Good to see these international rankings
Outstanding! Im pleased that Indian universities are included in this ranking, although it would be better if we had more Indian universities
Very few rankings give so much importance to careers and placements and I am very glad that the Youth Inc and education times and rediff ranking does just that.
I think it’s sad that there are just 4 or 5 indian universities in this ranking
I want to apply to colleges in Asia. Which ones do you recommend?
Is this only for Bachelors students? What about Masters?
University of Delhi sucks..Im surprised its even ranked.
As usual Harvard, Stanford make it to the top. But its so hard to get into these colleges.
Rankings suck..just go for colleges which have good courses.
People are so much nicer here. See how rude people are on: http://www.rediff.com/getahead/slide-show/slide-show-1-career-global-university-rankings-2013/20130301.htm
I am applying to UK and European universities this August. Will they accept me with HSC?
I love your Facebook page
How can I also participate in the student part of these rankings?
Dude, this entire Z score thingie is freaking scary!
Why are there so many US colleges in these rankings? Are they really that good?
I must say that Im impressed with how thorough these rankings are. A job well done.
We have participated in these rankings but were not ranked. Please let us know how we can be included in these rankings next year? CMJ University
Not that I mind but I would like to point out that it is IIT Bombay. If you wish to use Mumbai please insert a comma in between to indicate location.
So either of the following would do
IIT Bombay
IIT, Mumbai
IIT, Powai.
CMU below IIT Mumbai and UC Berkeley below IIT Delhi and IIT Mumbai..are you crazy? It is way way better, even for undergraduate studies. This one observation alone convince me that these ratings are not worth reading.
When are the next year’s rankings coming out?