Welcome to the Education Times & Youth Inc Global University Rankings 2011. This intensive research exercise has polled thousands of people in over 30 countries to rank the top undergraduate universities worldwide. We have ranked the top universities based on the responses we received from students, recruiters and faculty for a holistic perspective of the factors that play a crucial role in higher education. These factors range from financial aid to campus facilities and diversity on campus to career prospects after graduation. It also takes into consideration the facilities and the faculties offered. What makes these rankings truly different is that we have placed equal weight on responses given by recruiters as by students and institutes together.
Our global ranking of these institutions has thrown up some interesting results. The ranks of certain universities come as no surprise since they are that good; but the exciting news pertains to the others, the gate-crashers and hidden gems, which are now part of the crèmede-la-crème of educational institutions that every student worth his salt wants to be a part of. Our toppers belong to an elite club – from Harvard that towers high above the rest to Stanford and MIT, which come a close second and third, to Oxford thereafter; these are the institutes that prompt others to rise to the challenge and to compete in such rankings. Though catching up with the best is not an easy task, there are universities which have met the mark and done a great job. We see a few not-so-famous names among our top 100, who are doing a fantastic job with their curriculum and faculty, organising and building facilities for social activities and introducing innovative methods of teaching. They are on their way to becoming well-known brands.
On the flip-side even though you know it is going to be a foregone conclusion, there is only one institute from India that makes it to the top 100 – the Indian Institute of Technology Mumbai. It should not be that way. There should be room for plenty more, considering the demographics, especially the percentage of youth, which makes the major chunk of the population. This obviously paves the way for a greater potential for higher education in our country. We just need the right mindset with little or no interference from the government.
The diverse range of factors that have been considered in this survey have helped us to provide you with separate rankings that are more specialised, ranging from best campus facilities to value for money. Separate rankings according to the field of study are also available for students who have already chosen their professional specialisations.
The diverse range of factors that have been considered in this survey have provided us with separate rankings that are more specialised, ranging from campus facilities to value for money.
A Little Bit More…
- Forty four current and former faculty members at Harvard University are Nobel Laureates
- The Peking University campus is located in the former site of the Qing Dynasty royal gardens
- University of Manchester is the largest single-site university in the UK
- Seoul National University was the first national university in South Korea
- The name Oxford for Oxford University is derived from Ox-ford, which refers to a place where cattle could cross River Thames. The city has been around longer than the university
- The Edinburgh University Library pre-dates the university by three years
Youth Incorporated magazine ranks 100 universities across the world in an extensive research exercise involving students, faculty and recruiters
|
Institution | Country | Score | |
1 | Harvard University | USA | 100 | |
2 | Stanford University | USA | 99.8 | |
3 | Massachusetts Institute of Technology | USA | 99.7 | |
4 | University of Oxford | UK | 99.6 | |
5 | University of Chicago | USA | 99.4 | |
6 | Yale University | USA | 99.3 | |
7 | University of Pennsylvania | USA | 99.2 | |
8 | Columbia University | USA | 99 | |
9 | Imperial College London | UK | 98.7 | |
10 | Cornell University | USA | 98.6 | |
11 | Princeton University | USA | 98.5 | |
12 | California Institute of Technology | USA | 98.3 | |
13 | University of Toronto | Canada | 98.1 | |
14 | Northwestern University | USA | 98 | |
15 | University of Michingan Ann Arbor | USA | 97.4 | |
16 | McGill University | Canada | 97.3 | |
17 | University of Tokyo | Japan | 97.1 | |
18 | University of Cambridge | UK | 97 | |
19 | University of Melbourne | Australia | 96.5 | |
20 | London School of Economics | UK | 96.3 | |
21 | Ecole Normale Superieure | France | 96.2 | |
22 | Carnegie Mellon University | USA | 96 | |
23 | University of California Los Angeles | USA | 95.9 | |
24 | Brown University | USA | 95.5 | |
25 | New York University | USA | 95.3 | |
26 | University College London | UK | 95.2 | |
27 | Chinese University of Hong Kong | Hong Kong | 95.1 | |
28 | Duke University | USA | 95 | |
29 | National University | Singapore | 94.9 | |
30 | University of California Berkeley | USA | 94.8 | |
31 | Indian Institute of Technology Mumbai | India | 94.7 | |
32 |
|
Germany | 94.5 | |
33 | Emory University | USA | 94.3 | |
34 | Johns Hopkins University | USA | 94.2 | |
35 | Hong Kong University of Science & Tech | Hong Kong | 94 | |
36 | Ecole Polytechnique Federale de Lausanne | Switzerland | 93.9 | |
37 | IE University | Spain | 93.6 | |
38 | University of Copenhagen | Denmark | 93.5 | |
39 | University of Zurich | Switzerland | 93.3 | |
40 | Kings College London | UK | 93 | |
41 | Dartmouth College | USA | 92.6 | |
42 | University of British Columbia | Canada | 92.5 | |
43 | University of Virginia | USA | 92.4 | |
44 | Rice University | USA | 92.2 | |
45 | University of Texas at Austin | USA | 92.1 | |
46 | University of Sydney | Australia | 92 | |
47 | Universidade de Sao Paulo | Brazil | 91.8 | |
48 | Pontificia Universidad Catolica de Chile | Chile | 91.6 | |
49 | Vanderbilt University | USA | 91.5 | |
50 | Universitat Heidelberg | Germany | 91 | |
51 | University of Helsinki | Finland | 90.8 | |
52 | Peking University | China | 90.5 | |
53 | Technische Universitat Munchen | Germany | 90.1 | |
54 | University of Manchster | UK | 90 | |
55 | HEC | France | 89.5 | |
56 | Universidad de Buenos Aires | Argentina | 89 | |
57 | University of Southern California | USA | 88 | |
58 | Australian National University | Australia | 87 | |
59 | University of New South Wales | Australia | 86.6 | |
60 | Seoul National University | Korea | 86.4 | |
61 | Nanyang Technological Institute | Singapore | 86.1 | |
62 | University of Wisconsin Madison | USA | 86 | |
63 | Katholieke Universiteit Leuven | Belgium | 85.7 | |
64 | University of Edingburgh | UK | 85.3 | |
65 | University of North Carolina Chapel Hill | USA | 85 | |
66 | Tokyo Institute of Technology | Japan | 84.3 | |
67 | Monash University | Australia | 84 | |
68 | Universidad Nacional Autonoma de Mexico | Mexico | 83 | |
69 | Fudan University | China | 82 | |
70 | Erasmus University Rotterdam | Netherlands | 81.8 | |
71 | Ecole Polytechnique | France | 81 | |
72 | Tsinghua University | China | 80 | |
73 | Tohoku University | Japan | 79.6 | |
74 | Uppsala University | Sweden | 79.3 | |
75 | University of Warwick | UK | 79 | |
76 | University of Auckland |
|
78.6 | |
77 | University of Queensland | Australia | 78.2 | |
78 | National Taiwan University | Taiwan | 78 | |
79 | Munich Business School | Germany | 77.8 | |
80 | University of Groningen | Netherlands | 77.6 | |
81 | University of Bern | Switzerland | 77.2 | |
82 | Georgia Institute of Technology | USA | 77 | |
83 | University of Adlaide | Australia | 76.7 | |
84 | University of Rochester | USA | 76.3 | |
85 | Paris Dauphine | France | 76 | |
86 | University of Amsterdam | Netherlands | 75 | |
87 | Washington University St Louis | USA | 74 | |
88 | Ecole Centrale de Paris | France | 73 | |
89 | University of Washington | USA | 72 | |
90 | Durham University | UK | 71 | |
91 | Stockholm University | Sweden | 70 | |
92 | Purdue University | USA | 69 | |
93 | University of Bristol | UK | 68.6 | |
94 | University of York | UK | 68 | |
95 | Utrecht University | Netherlands | 67 | |
96 | Pennsylvania State University | USA | 66 | |
97 | Boston College | USA | 65 | |
98 | Pompeu Fabra University | Spain | 64 | |
99 | University of Vienna | Austria | 63.5 | |
100 | University of Tel Aviv | Israel | 63 |
2011 Top World Wide
|
Institution | Country | |
1 | Harvard University | USA | |
2 | Standford University | USA | |
3 |
|
USA | |
4 | University of Chicago | USA | |
5 | Yale University | USA | |
6 | University of Pennsylvania | USA | |
7 | Columbia University | USA | |
8 | Cornell University | USA | |
9 | Princeton University | USA | |
10 | California Institute of Technology | USA |
|
Institution | Country | |
1 | University of Oxford | UK | |
2 | Imperial College London | UK | |
3 | University of Cambridge | UK | |
4 | London School of Economics | UK | |
5 | Ecole Normale Superieure | France | |
6 | University College London | UK | |
7 |
|
Germany | |
8 | Ecole Polytechnique Federale de Lausanne | Switzerland | |
9 | IE University | Spain | |
10 | University of Copenhagen | Denmark |
Rank | Institution | Country |
1 | University of Tokyo | Japan |
2 | Chinese University of Hong Kong | Hong Kong |
3 | National University of Singapore | Singapore |
4 | Indian Institute of Technology Mumabi | India |
5 | Ecole Normale Superieure | France |
6 | Peking University | China |
7 | Seoul National University | Korea |
8 | Nanyang Technological Institute | Singapore |
9 | Tokyo Institute of Technology | Japan |
10 | Fudan University | China |
Top Australian Institutes
Rank | Institution | Country |
1 | University of Melbourne | Australia |
2 | University of Sydney | Australia |
3 | Australian National University | Australia |
4 | University of New South Wales | Australia |
5 | Monash University | Australia |
6 | University of Queensland | Australia |
7 | University of Adelaide | Australia |
Do You Know What You Want to Study?
A number of students know what stream they want to pursue when they begin undergraduate studies; however, most are still unsure. While some undergraduate degree programmes, mostly in the United States, allow you to take courses from different streams in your first year before deciding on your major, other institutes require you to apply directly for a specific programme offered. These institutes have been ranked according to field of study to make your choices easier.
Business Programmes
|
Institution | Country | |
1 | Harvard University | USA | |
2 | Stanford University | USA | |
3 | University of Oxford | UK | |
4 | London School of Economics | UK | |
5 | University of Cambridge | UK | |
6 | Columbia University | USA | |
7 |
|
USA | |
8 | Princeton University | USA | |
9 | National University of Singapore | Singapore | |
10 | University of Tokyo | Japan |
Engineering Programmes
|
Institution | Country | |
1 |
|
USA | |
2 | California Institute of Technology | USA | |
3 | Imperial College London | UK | |
4 | Stanford University | USA | |
5 | National University of Singapore | Singapore | |
6 | University of Oxford | UK | |
7 | University of Tokyo | Japan | |
8 | Columbia University | USA | |
9 | Cornell University | USA | |
10 | Georgia Institute of Technology | USA |
Art & Humanities
Rank | Institution | Country |
1 | Harvard University | USA |
2 | University of Cambridge | UK |
3 | Yale University | USA |
4 | Standford University | USA |
5 | Princeton University | USA |
6 | University of Oxford | UK |
7 | Columbia University | USA |
8 | University of Tokyo | Japan |
9 | National University of Singapore | Singapore |
10 | University of Toronto | Canada |
Life Science & Medicine
Rank | Institution | Country |
1 | University of Cambridge | UK |
2 | Harvard University | USA |
3 | John Hopkins University | USA |
4 | Stanford University | USA |
5 | University of Oxford | UK |
6 | Yale University | USA |
7 | University of California Berkeley | USA |
8 | Imperial College London | UK |
9 | University of Toronto | Canada |
10 | University of Sydney | Australia |
Pure Sciences
Rank | Institution | Country |
1 | Massachusetts Institute of Technology | USA |
2 | Harvard University | USA |
3 | University of Cambridge | UK |
4 | University of Oxford | UK |
5 | Princeton University | USA |
6 | Standford University | USA |
7 | Cornell University | USA |
8 | National University of Singapore | Singapore |
9 | Yale University | USA |
10 | University of Tokyo | Japan |
Value for Money
Rank | Institution | Country | |
1 | Yale University | USA | |
2 | Cornell University | USA | |
3 | McGill University | Canada | |
4 | London School of Economics | UK | |
5 | National University of Singapore | Singapore | |
6 | Indian Institute of Technology Mumbai | India | |
7 | Johns Hopkins University | USA | |
8 |
|
Hong Kong | |
9 | Universitat Heidelberg | Germany | |
10 | University of Helsinki | Finland |
Recruiter Satisfaction
Rank | Institution | Country | ||
1 | Harvard University | USA | ||
2 | Standford University | USA | ||
3 | London School of Economics | UK | ||
4 | Carnegie Mellon University | USA | ||
5 | Brown University | USA | ||
6 | Indian Institute of Technology Mumbai | India | ||
7 | University of Oxford | UK | ||
8 |
|
|
||
9 | University of Virginia | USA | ||
10 | Dartmouth College | USA |
Career Services
Rank | Institution | Country |
1 | Stanford University | USA |
2 | Harvard University | USA |
3 | Columbia University | USA |
4 | University of Pennsylvania | USA |
5 | Carnegie Mellon University | USA |
6 | Indian Institute of Technology Mumbai | India |
7 | Ecole Normale Superieure | France |
8 | Ludwig-Maximillians-Universitat Munchen | Germany |
9 | University of California LA | USA |
10 | National University of Singapore | Singapore |
Student Satisfaction
Rank | Institution | Country |
1 | Harvard University | USA |
2 | Stanford University | USA |
3 | University of Pennsylvania | USA |
4 | Columbia University | USA |
5 | Imperial College London | UK |
6 | University of Oxford | UK |
7 | University of Cambridge | UK |
8 | Ecole Normale Superieure | France |
9 | London School of Economics | UK |
10 | University of California LA | USA |
Campus Facilities
Rank | Institution | Country |
1 | Massachusetts Institute of Technology | USA |
2 | University of Oxford | UK |
3 | Cornell University | USA |
4 | Princeton University | USA |
5 | University of Cambridge | UK |
6 | University of Melbourne | Australia |
7 | Duke Unviersity | USA |
8 | Dartmouth College | USA |
9 | University of Texas at Austin | USA |
10 | University of Warwick | UK |
Innovation in Teaching Methodologies
Rank | Institution | Country |
1 | Harvard University | USA |
2 | Brown University | USA |
3 | London School of Economics | UK |
4 | Stanford University | USA |
5 | Ecole Normale Superieure | France |
6 | Dartmouth College | USA |
7 | Johns Hopkins University | USA |
8 | Columbia University | USA |
9 | Ludwig-Maximilians-Universitat Munchen | Germany |
10 | IE University | Spain |
Ranking Methodology
How did we choose institutes?
Youth Inc’s Research Unit (YRU) chose 500 institutes across the world after having discussions with students, recruiters and faculty. We also studied domestic rankings in various countries to find the best institutes.
All institutes were sent identical surveys. We contacted current students as well as local and international recruiters and gathered specific information about the institutes.
Factors considered
1. Recruiter Perception – Identical surveys were sent to recruiters worldwide. The recruiters were asked Methodology Ranking to rate the institutes that they were most likely to recruit from.
2. Diversity of Students – The institutes were asked to report the total number of students on campus and what percentage of the students were international and speak two or more languages. Gender diversity of the students was also considered.
3. Diversity of Faculty – The institutes were asked to report the total number of faculty on campus and what percentage of the faculty was international, held doctorate degrees and were accredited with their own publishing material. Gender diversity of faculty was also considered.
4. Innovation of Programmes – We considered the different ways used to construct degree programmes.
5. Innovation in Teaching Methodologies – Institutes were asked to select different teaching methodologies that we considered innovative. Some of these included company visits, dual or multiple majors and course collaborations between different departments at the institute. Our list was selected after surveying students across different campuses worldwide.
6. Value for Money – We considered students opinions on whether a particular school was perceived as ‘value for money’. We also asked institutes for the percentage of students who received some sort of funding from the institutes.
7. Campus Support – We asked the institutes and the students to select the different types of assistance provided by the student office or a similar body on campus. Our list was selected after surveying students across different campuses worldwide.
8. Career Service – We asked the institutes and students about the availability and functioning of a career service cell and how active such a service was for the students. We also considered what percentage of students were actually placed through the institute’s career service cell.
9. Extracurricular Activities on Campus – We asked students if they were encouraged by the school to participate in different extracurricular activities on campus. We also asked the institutes to select specific extracurricular activities that they offer on campus.
10. Exchange Programmes – Institutes were asked to report the percentage of students that opted for exchange programmes. We also considered the exchange students present on the institute’s campus.
11. Student Satisfaction – Students were asked to rate their institutes on various factors including attitude of staff and professors, location, course content and so on. Institutes were also asked to report the graduation rate of students enrolled in the first year.
Actual methodology
We sent invitations to 500 institutes. Institutes were provided a password using which they could send us their completed survey online. They were asked to answer questions relating to full time faculty, career service, undergraduate student and programme information and all the factors listed above.
We contacted current students of the institutes and asked them to rate specific statements which were pertaining to the factors we considered in this ranking.
Over 5000 recruiters were sent emails with a survey. The recruiter list was prepared from the responses of the institutes and also included internationally well-known recruiters. The recruiters were asked to enlist institutes that they were likely to recruit from.
The table above is a summary of the factors and the weightage given to each factor when we ranked the institutes. Each factor was made up of a set of questions. The total percentage attributed to that factor was based on the average score of the responses multiplied by the assigned weightage. We then totalled the score from all factors and sorted the scores from highest to lowest. The institute with the highest score was ranked first.
Not just numbers!
After we received the total computed scores for the institutes, we subjectively analysed the data provided by the institutes, current students and recruiters. If we found discrepancies in the satisfaction scores and the subjective descriptions, we omitted the data.
Institutes that did not fill out the survey reports in time
Out of 500 institutes that were contacted, 49 institutes did not complete the survey on time or did not respond. We used publicly available information on these institutes to include them in our ranking. We also contacted current students and recruiters of these institutes and compared the data we compiled with the data provided by the institutes that participated in our survey.
Information reported by recruiters
Recall of institute where to recruit from 20%
Likelihood of recruiting from same institute again 20%
Satisfaction with institute career cell 10%
Information reported by the school | Information reported by current students | |
Diversity of Students | 3% | 2% |
Diversity of Faculty | 3% | 2% |
Innovation of Programs | 3% | 2% |
Innovation in Teaching | 3% | 2% |
Methodologies | 3% | 2% |
Value for Money | 3% | 2% |
Campus Support | 3% | 2% |
Career Service | 3% | 2% |
Extracurricular Activities | 3% | 2% |
on Campus | 3% | 2% |
Exchange Programs | 3% | 2% |
Student Satisfaction | 3% | 2% |
Total | 30% | 20% |
Volume 1 Issue 6